View Online  |  Forward Newsletter
May 2024

Dear Client / Geagte Kliënt


Newsletter
 
 

 

CAN YOU LOSE YOUR DEPOSIT WHEN A HOME SALE FALLS THROUGH?

Wording such as "non-refundable deposit" and "retain all monies paid" often appears in an Offer to Purchase (OTP) of immovable property. A few recent articles on the subject have called the term "non-refundable deposit" a myth. 

Payment of deposits is often encouraged to show the Seller that the Purchaser is serious about buying the property. Sellers also often feel a sense of security when non-refundable deposits are paid. They may wrongly believe they will be entitled to the money deposited if the sale is cancelled due to the Purchaser's breach. The relevant Clause in the OTP discussed above is called a Penalty Clause, which allows the Seller, amongst others, to:

"…Cancel the agreement and retain all monies paid on account of the Purchase Price as liquidated damages…;" or

"… cancel the agreement without any further notice and retain all amounts paid by the Purchaser as "Rouwkoop" and the Purchaser authorises any third party holding such monies to pay the same to the Seller…"

Where a contract is cancelled unilaterally or by agreement, the general rule is that the parties are required to return each other to their position immediately before the conclusion of the agreement. This means that a Purchaser who paid a portion of a Purchase Price as a deposit is generally entitled to be repaid that sum. However, the duty to restore could be excluded by an agreement between parties with respect to a penalty clause.

Any penalty or liquidated damages in an OTP is subject to the provisions of the Conventional Penalties Act 15 of 1962 ("the Penalties Act"). A Purchaser may, therefore, approach a court who may, in terms of section 3 of the Penalties Act, "reduce the penalty to such an extent as it may consider equitable in the circumstances," or the Purchaser may reach an agreement with the Seller. 

What is Rouwkoop?

In Mineworkers Union v Prinsloo 1948 (3) SA 831 (A), Tindall JA observed that the "proper sense" of the word "rouwkoop" is that of an agreed sum of money paid by a contractant "to get quit of liability in respect of the contract". Although it may refer to a portion of the purchase price forfeited upon breach, it may also refer more broadly to a payment that the contract allows a party to make to withdraw from a contract, in which case the "withdrawal does not amount to breach". 

The Gauteng High Court in the matter of Kondile v Nothnagel NO 49891/2016) [2018] ZAGPPHC 858 (19 August 2018) said that "Although the court in Mineworkers Union held that the rouwkoop clause was not a penalty at common law, this has been overtaken by section 4 of the Penalties Act, in terms of which such provisions are indeed to be regarded as penalties."

When an Agreement is cancelled, the Conveyancers may not pay the deposit or monies paid (by the Purchaser) to the Seller as liquidated damages even if the OTP contains a Penalty Clause which authorises them to do so. Doing so would be unlawful. The money will have to remain in the Conveyancers trust account until the Seller and the Purchaser reach an agreement or until a competent court makes an order. If the parties cannot reach an agreement and if there's no court order to the contrary, the Purchaser runs the risk of the Conveyancers holding the monies back until the property is resold, as the Seller's damages can often only be calculated once the net selling price/market value of the property is known. Suppose the Seller's damages are less than the deposit and monies held by the Conveyancers. In that case, the Purchaser will be entitled to the difference. If the Seller's damages are more than the monies held in trust, the Seller may approach the court for an order.

Instead of referring to non-refundable deposits, the Penalty Clause in an OTP should reflect the true legal position. The following wording has been suggested: "If a buyer breaches the agreement and the Seller cancels the agreement as a result, the attorneys are authorised to hold the deposit in trust pending determination of the Seller's damages."

Regards / Groete

Eberhard, Cheryl-Anne, Andre, Marzanne & Kume

 


 
 
 
ArticleImage  
Appointing the Right Estate Agent

The professional industry of Property Practitioners is much broader than one might think.  Just like other professions, Property Practitioners also specialize in certain fields, to offer consumers specialist services, as one would expect from professionals.

To keep up with this ever evolving industry, the Property Practitioners Act was promulgated in February 2022 and is geared to regulate multiple functions of anyone dealing with property related matters.

Read More
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
In the Land of the Will, Clarity is King  
ArticleImage

Your will is probably the most important document you will ever sign, and a recent Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) decision confirms once again how critical it is to ensure that it is professionally drawn to reflect your wishes clearly and unambiguously. 

Let’s explore the legal principles involved and the “golden rule of interpretation” in the context of a bitter dispute between a financially-struggling widow on the one hand, and her three step-children on the other. Each contended for a different interpretation of the will, and the Court had to decide which interpretation correctly reflected the deceased’s intentions. 

Read More
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
ArticleImage  
Vog in die mure en mislukte waterdigting? Jy sal die verkopers kan dagvaar.

Beide verkopers sowel as kopers moet verstaan wat 'n "defek" of gebrek in 'n huis behels en wat die omvang en strekking van 'n verkoper se plig is om gebreke aan voornemende kopers uit te wys en te openbaar.

Die hooggeregshof het onlangs skadevergoeding aan ’n koper toegeken, wat eers bewus geword het van wesenlike vogprobleme in die huis nadat sy as koper reeds oordrag daarvan geneem het.

Die hof bespreek die effek van ’n standaard “voetstoots”-klousule op ’n koper se eis om herstel en skadevergoeding. Wat moet die koper bewys? Hoe het die verpligte verslag oor die eiendom se toestand die verkoper se aanspreeklikheid beïnvloed? Ons kyk hoe die hof hierdie vrae aangespreek het ...
Read More
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The Pothole Plague – Claiming Damages  
ArticleImage

As the “pothole plague” grows alarmingly both here and overseas, an increasing number of us are suffering pothole-related losses. 

We’ll discuss your right to claim for both vehicle damage and personal injury with reference to a recent High Court case which handed a resounding victory to a motorist suing a provincial road authority for R8.6m. He had crashed after hitting a pothole and although he had no personal memory of the accident, expert evidence was enough to persuade the Court that he should be awarded 100% or his proved or agreed damages.

Read More
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
ArticleImage  
Jou lening aan 'n vriend of ‘n familielid - Wanneer moet jy as 'n kredietverskaffer registreer?

Dit klink nie reg dat jy eers formeel ingevolge die Nasionale Kredietwet as 'n "kredietverskaffer" moet registreer voordat jy geld aan jou familie of jou vriende kan uitleen nie. As jy nie geregistreer was nie, terwyl jy wel geregistreer moes wees, kan dit inhou dat jou hele lening onwettig en onopeisbaar wees. Jy kan dus alles verloor. Jy kan selfs boetes opgelê word vir jou nie-nakoming van die voorskrifte en bepalings van die Nasionale Kredietwet.

'n Onlangse beslissing van die Appèlhof het gehandel oor die vraag of 'n lening van R15 miljoen aan 'n vriend, verseël met niks meer formeel as 'n handdruk nie, ‘n armlengte transaksie was of nie. 
Read More
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Legal Speak Made Easy  
ArticleImage

Insolvency”, “Liquidation” or “Bankruptcy”?

Commonly confused, these terms are usually encountered in the context of debtors who are unable to pay their debts. An individual’s or trust’s estate is “sequestrated” and a “trustee” appointed to sell the insolvent estate’s assets and to distribute the proceeds according to legal principles. A similar (but not identical) process applies to corporate entities like companies, but in this case the entity is “liquidated” or “wound up”, with a “liquidator” being appointed. To complicate matters, the term “bankruptcy” is often used loosely in both of the above scenarios - but the good news is that only lawyers really need to know the difference!  

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Our Directors
             
       
    Eberhard
Kruger
DIRECTOR
021 180 4552 / 082 789 1706
ekruger@vzk.co.za
      Cheryl-Anne
Ehrenreich
DIRECTOR
021 180 4564 / 082 783 7242
cheryl@vzk.co.za
      Andre
Van Greunen
DIRECTOR
021 180 4550
andre@vzk.co.za
   
     Full Bio →

       Full Bio →

       Full Bio →

   
         
     
    Marzanne
Van Wyk
DIRECTOR
021 180 4551
marzanne@vzk.co.za
      Kumedzani
Muloiwa
DIRECTOR
021 180 4578
kume@vzk.co.za
   
     

       

   
         
 
 
 
 
 
 

© LawDotNews & Van Zyl Kruger Inc. This newsletter is a general information sheet and should not be used or relied on as legal advice. No liability can be accepted for any errors or omissions nor for any loss or damage arising from reliance upon any information herein. Always contact your legal adviser for specific and detailed advice.

VAN ZYL KRUGER INCORPORATED (REG. NO 2015/174073/21) (VAT NUMBER 413 0273 172)


www.vzk.co.za

Suite 520 Tyger Lake, Niagara Road,
Tyger Waterfront, Bellville, Cape Town

info@vzk.co.za | Reception: 021 180 4550 | Fax: 021 180 4540


DIRECTORS: E S KRUGER (B.COMM LL.B MPRE); C A EHRENREICH (BA.LL.B LL.M); AJ VAN GREUNEN (BPROC, LLB, LLM);
M VAN WYK (B.COM LLB); K MULOIWA (LLB)
ASSOCIATES: S JANSE VAN RENSBURG (B.COM LL.B); L J CHANTLER (B.COMM LL.B);
A BARNARD (B.COM LL.B DIP.FIN PLANNING); B SCHOLTZ (LL.B)
PRACTICE MANAGER: F BRAVENBOER (NDIP FIS)
EXECUTIVE CONSULTANT: HL VAN ZYL (B.PROC) CONSULTANTS: JAL VAN ZYL (B.JURIS LL.B);
C I’ANSON-SPARKS Solicitor in England and Wales (LL.B(HONS), DIP LEGAL PRACTICE)